All vaccines are bioweapons. The current paradigms of modern vaccinology with the use of toxic adjuvants, preservatives, and metals was birthed by Jonas Salk, a card carrying eugenicist transhumanist who was funded by the Rockefellers, who are also eugenicists.

So let's use some really basic logic.

If their well iterated goal is to reduce the world population, why would they be funding and building infrastructure to create and mandate vaccines to reduce death and illness? Wouldn't this increase the world population in the end? Obviously yes. It's inherently contradictory and would not work towards that agenda, assuming vaccines are just doing what they are claimed to do in preventing disease and death, which they clearly don't.

Vaccines are not intended to kill upon injection either. If that happened, it would become too obvious and people would stop participating in their vaccination programs, like we're seeing now from the COVID vaccine fallout.

Vaccines are intended to subtly maim and set up for future health issues that are not associated with the vaccines you got as a child or even recently, so they can not only profit off those illnesses by attributing to other causes and take more of your resources and wealth from you to "treat" it, but also ensure you don't reproduce as much. They're very well designed ticking time bombs, with the primary target being fertility, which you can see in the data ever since the polio vaccine was released. Fertility rates are collapsing rapidly, and the mRNA vaccines are basically the final solution to end women's fertility.

The fertility and birth rate data that's released in the coming years will make this abundantly clear, but by then it will already be too late and the damage will be done.
https://twitter.com/Inversionism/status/1716578094520132060?t=CfSCrfQ0V5hCvT42VpHuEQ&s=19
All vaccines are bioweapons. The current paradigms of modern vaccinology with the use of toxic adjuvants, preservatives, and metals was birthed by Jonas Salk, a card carrying eugenicist transhumanist who was funded by the Rockefellers, who are also eugenicists. So let's use some really basic logic. If their well iterated goal is to reduce the world population, why would they be funding and building infrastructure to create and mandate vaccines to reduce death and illness? Wouldn't this increase the world population in the end? Obviously yes. It's inherently contradictory and would not work towards that agenda, assuming vaccines are just doing what they are claimed to do in preventing disease and death, which they clearly don't. Vaccines are not intended to kill upon injection either. If that happened, it would become too obvious and people would stop participating in their vaccination programs, like we're seeing now from the COVID vaccine fallout. Vaccines are intended to subtly maim and set up for future health issues that are not associated with the vaccines you got as a child or even recently, so they can not only profit off those illnesses by attributing to other causes and take more of your resources and wealth from you to "treat" it, but also ensure you don't reproduce as much. They're very well designed ticking time bombs, with the primary target being fertility, which you can see in the data ever since the polio vaccine was released. Fertility rates are collapsing rapidly, and the mRNA vaccines are basically the final solution to end women's fertility. The fertility and birth rate data that's released in the coming years will make this abundantly clear, but by then it will already be too late and the damage will be done. https://twitter.com/Inversionism/status/1716578094520132060?t=CfSCrfQ0V5hCvT42VpHuEQ&s=19
Angry
1
0 Commenti 0 Condivisioni 3K Visualizzazioni